Charlotte 1-4 Chicago Fire | Major League Soccer | GoalPulz
Skip to content
Goal
Pulz
Live
Matches
Analysis
Community
Leagues
Stats
World Cup 2026
Search teams, leaguesβ¦
Ctrl K
G
Charlotte vs Chicago Fire β Major League Soccer
Major League Soccer
Β·
United States
Β·
π Bank of America Stadium, Charlotte
Β·
π Sat, 17 May 2025, 23:30
β
Charlotte
β½
Patrick Agyemang 70'
FULL TIME
1
:
4
HT 0β1
β¦
Match story
Chicago Fire won 1β4. Chicago Fire created the better chances (xG 4.06β1.07).
β
xG
Away
1.07
4.06
21%
79%
β
Fouls
Even
Overview
Statistics
Lineups
Events
Player Stats
H2H
Form
Table
Key battle
Charlotte
Chicago Fire
Possession
53
Β·
47
1.07
Expected goals
4.06
12
Matches
Live
Leagues
Stats
More
β
Chicago Fire
β½
Jonathan Bamba 42'
β½
Brian GutiΓ©rrez 60'
β½
Philip Zinckernagel 63'
β½
Brian GutiΓ©rrez 79' (P)
12
12
50%
50%
π―
Shots
Away
12
23
34%
66%
β
Possession
Home
53%
47%
53%
47%
β³
Corners
Home
8
6
57%
43%
π¨
Cards
Even
2
2
50%
50%
Referee
Shots
23
4
On target
10
8
Corners
6
Team statistics
Full
1st half
2nd half
Attacking
12
shots total
23
4
shots on target
10
7
shots insidebox
17
5
shots outsidebox
6
4
shots blocked
7
6
dangerous attacks
9
84
attacks
52
1
big chances created
6
1
big chances missed
4
Passing & possession
53
ball possession
47
522
passes
470
475
successful passes
431
91
successful passes percentage
Defending
12
tackles
25
3
interceptions
8
5
saves
3
36
duels won
47
Set pieces
8
corners
6
2
offsides
3
4
throwins
2
10
goal kicks
7
Discipline
12
fouls
12
2
yellowcards
2
Other
4
shots off target
6
77
ball safe
66
0
penalties
1
9
goal attempts
15
Expected goals β full suite
1.07
xG
4.06
1.49
xGOT
2.82
0.23
xPoints
2.69
1.07
npxG
3.27
4.06
xGA
1.07
0.24
Set-play xG
1.52
0.83
Open-play xG
2.54
0.00
Penalty xG
0.79
0.09
Free-kick xG
0.03
0.16
Corner xG
0.10
0.42
9685
-1.23
92
8
key passes
16
22
total crosses
12
12
free kicks
11
3
substitutions
5
42
long passes
29
2
successful headers
0
2
accurate crosses
4
17
dribbled attempts
12
5
successful dribbles
6
29
successful dribbles percentage
50
30
successful long passes
15
71
successful long passes percentage
52