Corrections

How to report an error

Use the contact form and include, where you can:

• The page URL.
• What is shown, and what it should say.
• A source we can check it against — an official league or club page is ideal.

You do not need all three. A URL and a sentence is enough to start.

What happens next

We separate two kinds of error, because the fix is different:

• Data errors — a wrong score, a missing goal, a player at the wrong club. These usually originate in the upstream feed. We correct what we can on our side and report the rest to our data provider, so the fix reaches everyone rather than just this page.
• Editorial errors — a wrong claim, a bad number or a misleading framing in written analysis. These are ours. We fix the text and note that it was changed.

Material corrections to published analysis are noted on the piece rather than made silently. We do not delete a piece to make an error disappear.

Known limitations

Some things are not errors so much as gaps, and we would rather say so plainly: data coverage thins out in smaller competitions, historical seasons often carry results without event detail, and some statistics simply are not collected for some leagues. Where we lack verified data we hide the module rather than showing an empty one. The full picture is on data sources.

Model outputs are probabilities, not forecasts, and a losing 70% call is not by itself an error. How they are produced is documented on the methodology page.

Standards we hold ourselves to

Our editorial principles set out how analysis is produced, what we will not publish, and how commercial content is kept separate from editorial judgement.