BATE 2-1 Shirak | Champions League | GoalPulz

Skip to content

Matches Live Analysis Community LeaguesTeamssoonPlayers Stats

← Back to Matches

BATE vs Shirak – Champions League

Match Intelligence Center

Champions League·Europe·🕒 Tue, 18 Jul 2000, 22:00

FULL TIME

2:1

Form Guide →Head-to-Head →League Table →

Overview Statistics H2H Form Intel Table

Form Intelligence

medium data

BATE

34

Intel score

Shirak form edge

Shirak rate higher on weighted, opponent-adjusted form (47 vs 34).

50% conf

Shirak

47

Intel score

Shirak carry the stronger recent form once weighted and opponent-adjusted.

BATE: 0.89 weighted PPG (stable), opponent read unknown.
Shirak: 1.4 weighted PPG (stable), opponent read unknown.
Goals shape leans under 2.5 (25% of recent matches went over 2.5.).
Narrow losses: 2 of the losses were by a single goal.

True Form (weighted)

BATE→ stable

0.89weighted PPG

raw 0.90 · vol low

Venue-adj 1.20

50% conf · n=10

Shirak→ stable

1.40weighted PPG

raw 1.20 · vol medium

Venue-adj 1.14

50% conf · n=10

Surface & Venue

BATE

Surface unknown

Shirak

Surface unknown

Football

Matches
Live scores
Leagues
Players
Stats
Analysis

How we work

Methodology
Data sources
Editorial principles
Corrections

GoalPulz

About
Contact
FAQ
Support

Legal

Privacy
Terms
Cookies

© 2026 GoalPulz

Football data and analysis. Match data licensed from Sportmonks; probabilities and form models are our own. For information, not betting advice.

Opponent Quality

BATEunknown

Standings/opponent data unavailable.

20% conf · n=10

Shirakunknown

Standings/opponent data unavailable.

20% conf · n=10

Market Shape

Analytical context, not tips

Goals

Over 2.5 goalsunder83%

25% of recent matches went over 2.5. n=20

＋ BATE 10% · Shirak 40%

－ Recent games trending low-scoring

Both teams to scoreunder76%

BTTS hit in 35% of recent matches. n=20

Corners

Corners 9.5+under61%

~8.0 total corners/game across both sides. n=9

Cards

Cardsneutral48%

~3.6 total cards/game across both sides. n=9

False Form

No inflated-form signals.

Hidden Strength

Narrow losseshome

2 of the losses were by a single goal. 40% conf

2 one-goal defeats

Data Caveats

Opponent quality not classified (standings missing).
Sparse xG coverage in recent matches.
Same-surface splits unavailable — per-match pitch surface is not tracked.
Opponent quality not classified (standings missing).
Sparse xG coverage in recent matches.
Same-surface splits unavailable — per-match pitch surface is not tracked.

MATCH INTELFT

Result Snapshot

BATE win 2–1

Match Signals

Match signals appear once verified xG, shots and pressure data is available.

Prediction

Model snapshotPending

Model read appears when available.

Explore

Statistics→H2H→Form→Table→