Dempo 4-0 Mumbai FC | I-League | GoalPulz

Skip to content

Matches Live Analysis Community LeaguesTeamssoonPlayers Stats

← Back to Matches

Dempo vs Mumbai FC – I-League

Match Intelligence Center

I-League·India·🕒 Thu, 27 Oct 2011, 08:00

FULL TIME

4:0

Form Guide →Head-to-Head →

Overview H2H Form Intel

Form Intelligence

low data

Dempo

52

Intel score

Dempo form edge

Dempo rate higher on weighted, opponent-adjusted form (52 vs 38).

50% conf

Mumbai FC

38

Intel score

Dempo carry the stronger recent form once weighted and opponent-adjusted.

Dempo: 1.59 weighted PPG (rising), opponent read unknown.
Mumbai FC: 1.06 weighted PPG (volatile), opponent read unknown.
Goals shape leans over 2.5 (70% of recent matches went over 2.5.).
Narrow losses: 2 of the losses were by a single goal.

True Form (weighted)

Dempo▲ rising

1.59weighted PPG

raw 1.20 · vol medium

Venue-adj 2.20

50% conf · n=10

Mumbai FC↯ volatile

1.06weighted PPG

raw 1.00 · vol high

Venue-adj 0.60

50% conf · n=10

Surface & Venue

Dempo

Surface unknown

Mumbai FC

Surface unknown

Football

Matches
Live scores
Leagues
Players
Stats
Analysis

How we work

Methodology
Data sources
Editorial principles
Corrections

GoalPulz

About
Contact
FAQ
Support

Legal

Privacy
Terms
Cookies

© 2026 GoalPulz

Football data and analysis. Match data licensed from Sportmonks; probabilities and form models are our own. For information, not betting advice.

Opponent Quality

Dempounknown

Standings/opponent data unavailable.

15% conf · n=10

Mumbai FCunknown

Standings/opponent data unavailable.

15% conf · n=10

Market Shape

Analytical context, not tips

Goals

Over 2.5 goalsover79%

70% of recent matches went over 2.5. n=20

＋ Dempo 70% · Mumbai FC 70%

Both teams to scoreover76%

BTTS hit in 65% of recent matches. n=20

Corners

Corners 9.5+neutral53%

~9.6 total corners/game across both sides. n=9

Cards

Cardsover72%

~4.9 total cards/game across both sides. n=10

False Form

No inflated-form signals.

Hidden Strength

Narrow lossesaway

2 of the losses were by a single goal. 40% conf

2 one-goal defeats

Data Caveats

Opponent quality not classified (standings missing).
Sparse xG coverage in recent matches.
Same-surface splits unavailable — per-match pitch surface is not tracked.
Opponent quality not classified (standings missing).
Sparse xG coverage in recent matches.
Same-surface splits unavailable — per-match pitch surface is not tracked.

MATCH INTELFT

Result Snapshot

Dempo win 4–0

Match Signals

Match signals appear once verified xG, shots and pressure data is available.

Prediction

Model snapshotPending

Model read appears when available.

Explore