Melhus 3-1 Ottestad | 3. Division - Group 1 | GoalPulz

Skip to content

Matches Live Analysis Community LeaguesTeamssoonPlayers Stats

← Back to Matches

Melhus vs Ottestad – 3. Division - Group 1

Match Intelligence Center

3. Division - Group 1·Norway 🇳🇴·🕒 Sat, 01 Sept 2018, 11:00

FULL TIME

3:1

Form Guide →Head-to-Head →

Overview H2H Form Intel

Form Intelligence

low data

Melhus

49

Intel score

Melhus form edge

Melhus rate higher on weighted, opponent-adjusted form (49 vs 32).

30% conf

Ottestad

32

Intel score

Melhus carry the stronger recent form once weighted and opponent-adjusted.

Melhus: 1.45 weighted PPG (falling), opponent read unknown.
Ottestad: 0.84 weighted PPG (volatile), opponent read unknown.
Goals shape leans over 2.5 (64% of recent matches went over 2.5.).
Narrow losses: 2 of the losses were by a single goal.

True Form (weighted)

Melhus▼ falling

1.45weighted PPG

raw 1.80 · vol medium

Venue-adj 2.00

50% conf · n=10

Ottestad↯ volatile

0.84weighted PPG

raw 0.75 · vol medium

30% conf · n=4

Surface & Venue

Melhus

Surface unknown

Ottestad

Surface unknown

Football

Matches
Live scores
Leagues
Players
Stats
Analysis

How we work

Methodology
Data sources
Editorial principles
Corrections

GoalPulz

About
Contact
FAQ
Support

Legal

Privacy
Terms
Cookies

© 2026 GoalPulz

Football data and analysis. Match data licensed from Sportmonks; probabilities and form models are our own. For information, not betting advice.

Opponent Quality

Melhusunknown

Standings/opponent data unavailable.

15% conf · n=10

Ottestadunknown

Standings/opponent data unavailable.

15% conf · n=4

Market Shape

Analytical context, not tips

Goals

Over 2.5 goalsover63%

64% of recent matches went over 2.5. n=14

＋ Melhus 70% · Ottestad 50%

Both teams to scoreneutral53%

BTTS hit in 50% of recent matches. n=14

Corners

Corners 9.5+neutral53%

~9.6 total corners/game across both sides. n=9

Cards

Cardsunder66%

~2.8 total cards/game across both sides. n=9

False Form

No inflated-form signals.

Hidden Strength

Narrow lossesaway

2 of the losses were by a single goal. 40% conf

2 one-goal defeats

Data Caveats

Opponent quality not classified (standings missing).
Sparse xG coverage in recent matches.
Same-surface splits unavailable — per-match pitch surface is not tracked.
Small sample (4 matches) — treat signals as low confidence.
Opponent quality not classified (standings missing).
Sparse xG coverage in recent matches.

MATCH INTELFT

Result Snapshot

Melhus win 3–1

Match Signals

Match signals appear once verified xG, shots and pressure data is available.

Prediction

Model snapshotPending

Model read appears when available.

Explore