NTNUI vs Melhus | 3. Division - Group 1 | GoalPulz

Skip to content

Matches Live Analysis Community LeaguesTeamssoonPlayers Stats

← Back to Matches

NTNUI vs Melhus – 3. Division - Group 1

Match Intelligence Center

3. Division - Group 1·Norway 🇳🇴·🕒 Sat, 10 Oct 2020, 12:00

FULL TIME

–:–

Form Guide →Head-to-Head →

Overview H2H Form Intel

Form Intelligence

low data

NTNUI

35

Intel score

Melhus form edge

Melhus rate higher on weighted, opponent-adjusted form (49 vs 35).

50% conf

Melhus

49

Intel score

Melhus carry the stronger recent form once weighted and opponent-adjusted.

NTNUI: 0.94 weighted PPG (stable), opponent read unknown.
Melhus: 1.45 weighted PPG (falling), opponent read unknown.
Goals shape leans over 2.5 (65% of recent matches went over 2.5.).
Narrow losses: 2 of the losses were by a single goal.

True Form (weighted)

NTNUI→ stable

0.94weighted PPG

raw 1.10 · vol medium

Venue-adj 1.20

50% conf · n=10

Melhus▼ falling

1.45weighted PPG

raw 1.80 · vol medium

Venue-adj 1.67

50% conf · n=10

Surface & Venue

NTNUI

Surface unknown

Melhus

Surface unknown

Football

Matches
Live scores
Leagues
Players
Stats
Analysis

How we work

Methodology
Data sources
Editorial principles
Corrections

GoalPulz

About
Contact
FAQ
Support

Legal

Privacy
Terms
Cookies

© 2026 GoalPulz

Football data and analysis. Match data licensed from Sportmonks; probabilities and form models are our own. For information, not betting advice.

Opponent Quality

NTNUIunknown

Standings/opponent data unavailable.

15% conf · n=10

Melhusunknown

Standings/opponent data unavailable.

15% conf · n=10

Market Shape

Analytical context, not tips

Goals

Over 2.5 goalsover76%

65% of recent matches went over 2.5. n=20

＋ NTNUI 60% · Melhus 70%

Both teams to scoreover72%

BTTS hit in 60% of recent matches. n=20

Corners

Corners 9.5+under52%

~8.9 total corners/game across both sides. n=13

Cards

Cardsneutral53%

~3.8 total cards/game across both sides. n=13

False Form

No inflated-form signals.

Hidden Strength

Narrow losseshome

2 of the losses were by a single goal. 40% conf

2 one-goal defeats

Data Caveats

Opponent quality not classified (standings missing).
Sparse xG coverage in recent matches.
Same-surface splits unavailable — per-match pitch surface is not tracked.
Opponent quality not classified (standings missing).
Sparse xG coverage in recent matches.
Same-surface splits unavailable — per-match pitch surface is not tracked.

MATCH INTELFT

Result Snapshot

Draw 0–0

Match Signals

Match signals appear once verified xG, shots and pressure data is available.

Prediction

Model snapshotPending

Model read appears when available.

Explore