Olimps / RFS 0-2 Tranzits | Virsliga | GoalPulz

Skip to content

Matches Live Analysis Community LeaguesTeamssoonPlayers Stats

← Back to Matches

Olimps / RFS vs Tranzits – Virsliga

Match Intelligence Center

Virsliga·Latvia·🕒 Thu, 23 Sept 2010, 13:30

FULL TIME

0:2

HT 0–0

Form Guide →Head-to-Head →

Overview H2H Form Intel

Form Intelligence

low data

Olimps / RFS

12

Intel score

Tranzits form edge

Tranzits rate higher on weighted, opponent-adjusted form (23 vs 12).

50% conf

Tranzits

23

Intel score

Tranzits carry the stronger recent form once weighted and opponent-adjusted.

Olimps / RFS: 0.09 weighted PPG (stable), opponent read unknown.
Tranzits: 0.48 weighted PPG (stable), opponent read unknown.
Goals shape leans over 2.5 (75% of recent matches went over 2.5.).
Narrow losses: 2 of the losses were by a single goal.

True Form (weighted)

Olimps / RFS→ stable

0.09weighted PPG

raw 0.10 · vol low

Venue-adj 0.20

50% conf · n=10

Tranzits→ stable

0.48weighted PPG

raw 0.50 · vol medium

Venue-adj 0.80

50% conf · n=10

Surface & Venue

Olimps / RFS

Surface unknown

Tranzits

Football

Matches
Live scores
Leagues
Players
Stats
Analysis

How we work

Methodology
Data sources
Editorial principles
Corrections

GoalPulz

About
Contact
FAQ
Support

Legal

Privacy
Terms
Cookies

© 2026 GoalPulz

Football data and analysis. Match data licensed from Sportmonks; probabilities and form models are our own. For information, not betting advice.

Surface unknown

Opponent Quality

Olimps / RFSunknown

Standings/opponent data unavailable.

15% conf · n=10

Tranzitsunknown

Standings/opponent data unavailable.

15% conf · n=10

Market Shape

Analytical context, not tips

Goals

Over 2.5 goalsover83%

75% of recent matches went over 2.5. n=20

＋ Olimps / RFS 90% · Tranzits 60%

Both teams to scoreneutral69%

BTTS hit in 55% of recent matches. n=20

False Form

No inflated-form signals.

Hidden Strength

Narrow losseshome

2 of the losses were by a single goal. 40% conf

2 one-goal defeats

Narrow lossesaway

3 of the losses were by a single goal. 40% conf

3 one-goal defeats

Data Caveats

Opponent quality not classified (standings missing).
Sparse xG coverage in recent matches.
Same-surface splits unavailable — per-match pitch surface is not tracked.
Low form score (12) — weak recent results.
Opponent quality not classified (standings missing).
Sparse xG coverage in recent matches.

MATCH INTELFT

Result Snapshot

Tranzits win 0–2

Match Signals

Match signals appear once verified xG, shots and pressure data is available.

Prediction

Model snapshotPending

Model read appears when available.

Explore