Qviding FIF 1-2 Degerfors | Superettan | GoalPulz

Skip to content

Matches Live Analysis Community LeaguesTeamssoonPlayers Stats

← Back to Matches

Qviding FIF vs Degerfors – Superettan

Match Intelligence Center

Superettan·Sweden 🇸🇪·🕒 Sat, 20 May 2006, 22:00

FULL TIME

1:2

HT 0–0

Form Guide →Head-to-Head →

Overview H2H Form Intel

Form Intelligence

low data

Qviding FIF

48

Intel score

Qviding FIF form edge

Qviding FIF rate higher on weighted, opponent-adjusted form (48 vs 24).

50% conf

Degerfors

24

Intel score

Qviding FIF carry the stronger recent form once weighted and opponent-adjusted.

Qviding FIF: 1.42 weighted PPG (stable), opponent read unknown.
Degerfors: 0.51 weighted PPG (stable), opponent read unknown.
Goals shape leans over 2.5 (75% of recent matches went over 2.5.).
Narrow losses: 2 of the losses were by a single goal.

True Form (weighted)

Qviding FIF→ stable

1.42weighted PPG

raw 1.50 · vol medium

Venue-adj 1.60

50% conf · n=10

Degerfors→ stable

0.51weighted PPG

raw 0.70 · vol medium

Venue-adj 0.40

70% conf · n=10

Surface & Venue

Qviding FIF

Surface unknown

Degerfors

Football

Matches
Live scores
Leagues
Players
Stats
Analysis

How we work

Methodology
Data sources
Editorial principles
Corrections

GoalPulz

About
Contact
FAQ
Support

Legal

Privacy
Terms
Cookies

© 2026 GoalPulz

Football data and analysis. Match data licensed from Sportmonks; probabilities and form models are our own. For information, not betting advice.

Surface unknown

Opponent Quality

Qviding FIFunknown

Standings/opponent data unavailable.

15% conf · n=10

Degerforsunknown

Standings/opponent data unavailable.

15% conf · n=10

Market Shape

Analytical context, not tips

Goals

Over 2.5 goalsover83%

75% of recent matches went over 2.5. n=20

＋ Qviding FIF 100% · Degerfors 50%

Both teams to scoreover83%

BTTS hit in 75% of recent matches. n=20

Corners

Corners 9.5+neutral78%

~9.8 total corners/game across both sides. n=19

Cards

Cardsneutral76%

~3.2 total cards/game across both sides. n=19

False Form

No inflated-form signals.

Hidden Strength

Narrow lossesaway

2 of the losses were by a single goal. 40% conf

2 one-goal defeats

Data Caveats

Opponent quality not classified (standings missing).
Sparse xG coverage in recent matches.
Same-surface splits unavailable — per-match pitch surface is not tracked.
Opponent quality not classified (standings missing).
Same-surface splits unavailable — per-match pitch surface is not tracked.

MATCH INTELFT

Result Snapshot

Degerfors win 1–2

Match Signals

Match signals appear once verified xG, shots and pressure data is available.

Prediction

Model snapshotPending

Model read appears when available.

Explore