WAFA vs Medeama | Premier League | GoalPulz

Skip to content

Matches Live Analysis Community LeaguesTeamssoonPlayers Stats

← Back to Matches

WAFA vs Medeama – Premier League

Match Intelligence Center

Premier League·Ghana·🕒 Sun, 29 Mar 2020, 13:00

FULL TIME

–:–

Form Guide →Head-to-Head →

Overview H2H Form Intel

Form Intelligence

low data

WAFA

46

Intel score

Even on form

Form intelligence scores are close (46 vs 41).

50% conf

Medeama

41

Intel score

WAFA and Medeama are closely matched on recent form.

WAFA: 1.36 weighted PPG (stable), opponent read unknown.
Medeama: 1.18 weighted PPG (stable), opponent read unknown.
Goals shape leans under 2.5 (30% of recent matches went over 2.5.).
Narrow losses: 2 of the losses were by a single goal.

True Form (weighted)

WAFA→ stable

1.36weighted PPG

raw 1.20 · vol medium

Venue-adj 1.40

50% conf · n=10

Medeama→ stable

1.18weighted PPG

raw 1.20 · vol medium

Venue-adj 0.80

50% conf · n=10

Surface & Venue

WAFA

Surface unknown

Medeama

Surface unknown

Football

Matches
Live scores
Leagues
Players
Stats
Analysis

How we work

Methodology
Data sources
Editorial principles
Corrections

GoalPulz

About
Contact
FAQ
Support

Legal

Privacy
Terms
Cookies

© 2026 GoalPulz

Football data and analysis. Match data licensed from Sportmonks; probabilities and form models are our own. For information, not betting advice.

Opponent Quality

WAFAunknown

Standings/opponent data unavailable.

15% conf · n=10

Medeamaunknown

Standings/opponent data unavailable.

15% conf · n=10

Market Shape

Analytical context, not tips

Goals

Over 2.5 goalsunder79%

30% of recent matches went over 2.5. n=20

＋ WAFA 30% · Medeama 30%

－ Recent games trending low-scoring

Both teams to scoreunder72%

BTTS hit in 40% of recent matches. n=20

Corners

Corners 9.5+under59%

~8.0 total corners/game across both sides. n=8

Cards

Cardsneutral45%

~3.7 total cards/game across both sides. n=9

False Form

No inflated-form signals.

Hidden Strength

Narrow lossesaway

2 of the losses were by a single goal. 40% conf

2 one-goal defeats

Data Caveats

Opponent quality not classified (standings missing).
Sparse xG coverage in recent matches.
Same-surface splits unavailable — per-match pitch surface is not tracked.
Opponent quality not classified (standings missing).
Sparse xG coverage in recent matches.
Same-surface splits unavailable — per-match pitch surface is not tracked.

MATCH INTELFT

Result Snapshot

Draw 0–0

Match Signals

Match signals appear once verified xG, shots and pressure data is available.

Prediction

Model snapshotPending

Model read appears when available.

Explore